Procter v Procter: Partners Beware – The Paradox of Non-Exclusive “Exclusive Possession”

Where 3 partners owned the freehold, a tenancy was inferred in favour of all 5 partners together, who were considered to have possession exclusive of 3 of their number.

The article written by Bruce Walker and published by Practical Law in their Property Litigation Column can be viewed by clicking on the following link;